[ Originally published on April 2nd, 2016 ]
LISTEN TO THIS ARTICLE:
The
“Samson
Option”
is the name that has been given to zionist
Israel’s
ultimate deterrence strategy; one of massive nuclear [and
sometimes chemical and thermo-nuclear]
retaliation against any and all attacks that may threaten their
existence
or socio-political agenda.
It
takes its name from the biblical character of Samson,
whom,
after being taken prisoner, pushed apart the pillars of a Philistine
temple, thus bringing down the roof, simultaneously killing himself
and
all of the Philistines who had captured him.
The
rationale behind zionist Israel’s Samson
Option? If zionist Israel dies, then
everyone dies …
Although
they refuse
to officially
acknowledge
the mere
existence
of their arsenal of nuclear, thermo-nuclear and chemical weapons
caches, zionist
Israel
is believed
to possess
anywhere between
70
and 500
nuclear warheads [around
200 seems to be the general consensus],
with records affirming that nuclear proliferation has been a top
priority
of the
genocidal rogue
state
since
its
initial creation in
1948.
The country is also yet to sign the International
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
.
Zionist
Israeli
military forces have long
possessed
medium-range land, air and sea-based methods for deploying their
nuclear weapons. In January of 2008,
their Jericho
III
intercontinental
ballistic
missile
became operational, giving them
extremely
long
range
nuclear strike capabilities
as well. They are also reported
to be capable of assembling and detonating Suitcase
Bombs,
Electro-Magnet
Pulses,
Enhanced
Radiation Weapons
[Neutron
Bombs],
Nuclear
Landmines
[Atomic
Demolition Munitions]
and mobile
Tactical
Nuclear Weapons.
Zionist
Israel’s nuclear
doctrine is said to have been shaped by its
lack of strategic depth. It relies heavily on a reservist-based
military which, in turn, magnifies civilian and military losses in
its small population. Zionist Israel compensates
for these weaknesses by emphasizing
intelligence, maneuverability and firepower. As a result, its
strategy is based upon the premise that it absolutely cannot
afford to lose a single
war and must accomplish this by maintaining massive
deterrence, including the option of pre-emptive strikes.
Zionist
Israel first articulated an official policy on the use
of nuclear weapons in 1966, which revolved
around their 4 “red lines,”
which they posited would lead to a nuclear
response on their part:
1)
A successful military penetration into populated areas within zionist
Israel’s
post-1949
[pre-1967]
borders.
2)
The destruction of the zionist
Israeli Air Force.
3)
The exposure of zionist
Israeli
cities to massive and devastating air attacks or to possible chemical
or biological attacks.
4)
The
use of nuclear weapons against a
zionist Israeli
territory.
The
Samson
Option
is not merely theoretical
in nature, but appears to have been threatened
or even invoked numerous
times in the past
[and
possibly even more, of which we are unaware].
I wouldn’t put it passed them, as these people
[and
I use that word extremely lightly]
are capable
of things
that you and I wouldn’t do to our worst
enemies. Examples of the Samson
Option
being
used by zionist
Israel
include:
1) Zionist
Israel
threatened
to use nuclear weapons on the third day of the 1973
Yom Kippur [Arab–Israeli]
War,
blackmailing then-current
U.S.
[United
States of America]
President Richard
Nixon
and
Secretary
of State Henry
Kissinger
into air-lifting U.S. military supplies to zionist
Israeli
troops. They also threatened nuclear retaliation against then-current
Egyptian
President Anwar
Sadad
for his part in the war.
2)
In
1981,
zionist
Israel
bombed an Iraqi nuclear facility.
3)
During the 1991
Gulf War,
zionist
Israel
deployed armed mobile nuclear missile launchers and aimed them toward
Iraq.
4)
When Menachem
Begin’s
conservative party coalition took control of zionist
Israel
in 1977,
he immediately targeted numerous Soviet cities with nuclear missiles.
5)
In the build-up to the U.S.’ 2003
invasion
of Iraq, zionist
Israel
threatened Iraq with nuclear attack.
But
possibly most damning
of
all
is research done by freelance investigative reporter Jim
Stone,
who reveals that
zionist
Israel’s
main strategy has been to smuggle nuclear weapons into sensitive and
important areas of other nations.
They purportedly do so under the guise of security
operations,
gaining access to sensitive locations via private security contracts.
These security contracts use proprietary equipment, replete
with hidden, armed nuclear devices, which
are
maintained
only
by the
zionist
Israelis.
With
zionist
Israel holding the whole world hostage via the threat
of nuclear attack,
what are nations and world leaders to do, but give in to the
zionists’
demands?
I
will leave you with a quote from Alan
Hart’s
1971
BBC
[British
Broadcasting Company] interview
with former zionist
Israeli Prime Minister Golda
Meir:
Hart:
“Prime
Minister … You are saying that if ever Israel was in danger
of being defeated on the battlefield, it would be prepared to take
the region, and even the whole world down with it?”
Meir:
“Yes,
that’s EXACTLY what I am saying.”
FURTHER READING:
► "Israel's
Chemical / Biological Weapons: History, Deterrence And Arms Control" (Avner
Cohen) [PDF]
► "The
Samson
Option: Israel's Nuclear Arsenal And American Foreign Policy" (Seymour
M. Hersh) [PDF]
Stay
conscious my friends
~ Merit Freeman
PERMALINK:
Comments
Post a Comment